Isaac Cruz – Angel Fierro Rematch is likely to be left in July on the Pacquiao-Barrios card


Isaac ‘Pitbull’ Cruz in July Mario Barrios Manny Pacquiao vs. Mario Barrios can fight against the Army against Mario Barrios. This event has yet to be confirmed. Cruz (27-3-1, 18 Kos) Fierro (27-3-2, 18 kos) 10 round decisions, earlier this year, 98-92, 97-93, and with scores of 96-94. There would be no filateral because some boxing fans felt a questionable result.

Fierro again?

I saw the fight, and I had to win Cruz 9-. There was no discussion. The only question about the score is why the judges had so close. Pitbull was dominated by that battle, but the judges did not give him credit, landing the body shots. Fans would prefer to see someone else’s fighting, WBA Light Welterweight champion Gary Antanene Russell, IBF Champ Richardson Hitchins or Teofimo Lopez for his wbo belt.

Pitbull Cruz fought in Ryan Garcia last Friday night, but he did not want to negotiate with him while he was scheduled to fight the Fierce FIERRO 1 February. Cruz must roll himself now because he had no more money against Ryan, but he caught the title of ‘usual’ Wellterweight. If Garcia had taken the fight and won, it would be in the position to get money against another known fighter.

What does Pitbull do not need to carry out anti-competitors tools, because its competitive or controversial struggle. It should be moved, challenging world titles.

Pitbull style

Cruz Mike looks like a small Tyson against the fierter. It was impressive how the Fierro fell when he missed himself. Cruz focused on his body, and he could not do anything to get out of the path of these shots. Again, the judges did not credit for his body work, because they got rough decisions.

Fierro has lost two of the last three fighters and goes to the passenger’s situation. His other failure went to Alfredo Santiago last year in June, and 10 round decisions was a failure. If anyone in the fierce has to re-enter, it should be Santiago.

YouTube videoYouTube video

Last Updated 2012/05/05



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *